I’m setting up a new hard drive and formatted it as exFAT. I liked the cross platform support and not having to deal with permissions when mounting the device. BUT it doesn’t support hardlinks, which I want to use for the *arr apps. Is NTFS the best pick, and I’ll just have to live with read only on mac?

  • vzq@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    281·
    3 months ago

    My recommendation would be to use a hard disk in a single computer, and to use a single operating system for a single computer.

    Then you pick the most capable, fastest, native FS that fits your bill.

    If you need to transmit data between computers, use the network. It’s that it’s there for.

    • schizo@forum.uncomfortable.businessEnglish
      81·
      3 months ago

      I’d 2nd this: you’re using it for downloading media, so presumably one of the computers is the one running the actual software that’s doing that. Just share the drive over the network from there, and pick the best-supported FS on that platform.

  • hperrin@lemmy.worldEnglish
    101·
    3 months ago

    Why are you running servers with a data store on a partition that you mount on multiple operating systems?

    • corroded@lemmy.worldEnglish
      6·
      3 months ago

      I’m a big fan of ZFS, and I use it extensively. For a single hard drive, though, wouldn’t ext4 and a few NFS shares make a lot more sense?

      • paperd@lemmy.zipEnglish
        2·
        3 months ago

        zfs is fine on a single drive too, and its cross platform, which OP said they wanted (though not which platforms, which is important here). ext4 is junk on windows and nfs doesn’t work well either for windows, which i assume OP wants because they mention NTFS.

    • raldone01@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      3 months ago

      Sonarr prowlarr radarr and many more. These are very powerful media download managers. I recommend using usenet.

  • Prison Mike@links.hackliberty.orgEnglish
    2·
    3 months ago

    I’m a huge fan of XFS for network mounts. I think everyone else here is right that the best filesystem will depend on the OS, and picking one to make it compatible with everything has serious tradeoffs.

  • Decronym@lemmy.decronym.xyzBEnglish
    1·
    3 months ago

    Acronyms, initialisms, abbreviations, contractions, and other phrases which expand to something larger, that I’ve seen in this thread:

    Fewer Letters More Letters
    NFS Network File System, a Unix-based file-sharing protocol known for performance and efficiency
    RAID Redundant Array of Independent Disks for mass storage
    ZFS Solaris/Linux filesystem focusing on data integrity

    3 acronyms in this thread; the most compressed thread commented on today has 6 acronyms.

    [Thread #913 for this sub, first seen 8th Aug 2024, 22:15] [FAQ] [Full list] [Contact] [Source code]

  • beefsquatch@programming.devOPEnglish
    1·
    3 months ago

    Ohhh I didn’t realize it didn’t matter if it was accessed over the network with samba. This’ll just be on a Debian server

    • Dark Arc@social.packetloss.ggEnglish
      41·
      3 months ago

      Yeah, so in that case I’d just use ext4 or, if you want checksums, btrfs (though this doesn’t matter too much as btrfs currently doesn’t support raid in any real sense, so it can’t actually correct the data, just tell you it’s bad).

      ZFS can do the checksums with RAID and error correction, but getting that on Linux (without using a specialty distro like TrueNAS Scale) is still a pain.