• Possibly linux@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    19 hours ago

    You objectively shouldn’t expose Jellyfin to the internet. It has a rather large attack surface and isn’t designed with security in mind.

    Pretending everything is fine won’t solve the problem

    • kieron115@startrek.website
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Sounds like a great reason to use Plex instead!

      edit: to add something constructive to my snarky comment, what kind of attack surface are we talkin here? Multiple ports? Lots of separate services running? No authentication?

      • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        15 hours ago

        There has been a known “anyone can access your media without authentication” vulnerability for seven years and counting, and the Jellyfin devs have openly stated that they have no intentions of fixing it. Because fixing it would require completely divesting from the Enby branch that the entire program is built upon. And they never plan on refactoring that entire thing, so they never plan on fixing the vulnerabilities.

        The “don’t expose it to the internet” people aren’t just screaming at clouds. Jellyfin is objectively insecure, and shouldn’t be exposed.

        • grrgyle@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          13 hours ago

          Ahh bummer. It works so well as a home media server… kind of calls out for sharing.

        • kieron115@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          14 hours ago

          Jeez, so it’s meant to be a literal home media server. Able, but not designed, to be used for sharing.

          • mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            14 hours ago

            Exactly. And that’s honestly why I doubt it will ever truly contend with Plex. It’s fine for sharing with friends who can figure out how to connect via VPN, but it’ll never be robust enough to share with your tech-illiterate grandparents on the open internet. Plex wins handily in that regard, because their sign in process is basically the same as Netflix, HBO, Hulu, etc…

            Plex has problems of its own, but (at least as of me writing this) it doesn’t have any major known security vulnerabilities. They had some level 10.0 vulnerability last year, but they followed standard CVE protocols and patched it before the vulnerability was actually released.

        • kieron115@startrek.website
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Sure, but being mostly secure by default isn’t one of them. One advantage of running a service that offers optional subscription services is that they can offer security features like built-in SSL and AAA that just work. Any average user can install it and have a reasonably secure service running. Hell, until a few months ago you didn’t even need to open a port to have remote access to your content, whether you paid or not. Now they’ve made that a paid feature though.