I just recently stumbled on this and I’ve never heard anyone here that uses it. It looks quite interesting. A dash for your Proxmox server.
The live demo looks jammy: https://demo.proxcenter.io/
The docs look quite comprehensive: https://docs.proxcenter.io/
Github: https://github.com/adminsyspro/proxcenter-ui
Runs in a Docker container. There is an community version and an enterprise version. I think I’m going to bump this up the Projects list to the top.
You must log in or # to comment.
Site does not load
Weird. It loads here:
I heard you like containers so I put some docker in your prox mox so you can prox mox while you docker
Proxmox is also making their own: https://www.proxmox.com/en/products/proxmox-datacenter-manager/overview
source code: https://github.com/proxmox/proxmox-datacenter-manager
Two more that I have found:
PegaProx
Kinky.
As far as UI goes, that Proxmox Datacenter Manager looks similar to ProxCenter. I agree with @non_burglar@lemmy.world, in that a proper dashboard was missing.
I don’t use proxmox anymore, but it certainly needed a proper dashboard for basic metrics.
Why not? What did you move to?
Proxmox has a lot of tools I don’t need and I didn’t like how proxmox manages storage. Now I use Incus, mostly because incus doesn’t care about your storage back-end, networking, etc.
What’s wrong with proxmox storage? Am I about to make a mistake?
This looks really cool, but I wish that OIDC wasn’t tied to an enterprise license that doesn’t show a price (just a contact us form and email address) and requires annual renewal.
I’d be willing to pay a reasonable one time fee to unlock OIDC support, and I understand why they charge a recurring fee for the other enterprise license features, but as it currently stands this doesn’t really make sense for a home lab.
You can do oidc with the proxmox ui itself.
I use oidc with Incus, which is a fork of lxd and a similar software to proxmox, it can run vm’s and lxd containers.
Yes I already do so, but this dashboard requires an enterprise license to also use OIDC.
It’s unfortunately common, even though it probably shouldn’t be.
Good to see that site is getting updates again.
Agreed.
I don’t mind paying a reasonable price for access to SSO, especially if the service is fully provided by third-party infrastructure. For something that is fully self hosted on the other hand, a recurring cost for what should be a basic (or at most a one time reasonable fee) feature feels egregious.
It’s super douchey when people show their GitHub stars.
How so? It’s one of the things I check in addition to last update, etc.
Douchey little popularity contests do not mean code is good. It’s misleading just like upvotes. It’s just what social media loving developers do. Most respectable (not all) projects avoid making a big deal out of it. It already shows it on GitHub. Why show it again? To be douchey?
Hmmm
do not mean code is good
Doesn’t mean it’s bad either, but warrants checking out.
- Amazon’s Best Seller List
- #1 rated truck by Consumer Reports
- #5 in the Contemporary Jazz Soul charts
- #1 rated NAS of 2026
- Downloaded 5034 times
I guess I just don’t see it as douchey. To me is says, ‘hey this might be worth checking out.’ Besides Lemmy and a couple of long standing forums, I really don’t do social media so perhaps I not as jaded.
I mean it’s a metric. Not a perfect one, but it helps to get an overview of the state of a repository.
No it doesn’t. Popularity contest only.
seems unfinished
I’m not exactly sure what you are try to convey to me.
The site does not load
