Hi there,

I wish to run a wireguard docker through a glueton docker so that i can access my paid vpn from my own server. This is what i want:

client -> wireguard docker(selfhosted) -> gluetun docker(connected to paid VPN) -> internet

I have posted before with this issue but still cannot get it to work as expected. I am not sure if there is issues with the wireguard docker not being able to route back through from gluetun as it is trying to force traffic through the tunnel.

Any help would be much appreciated.

docker-compose.yml:

services:
  gluetun_test:
    image: qmcgaw/gluetun
    container_name: gluetun_test
    cap_add:
      - NET_ADMIN
    ports:
      - "5010:5000"
      - "5011:8000"
     # Port of the WireGuard VPN server
      - "36843:36843/udp"
    environment:
      - VPN_SERVICE_PROVIDER=custom
      - VPN_TYPE=wireguard
      - WIREGUARD_PUBLIC_KEY=
      - WIREGUARD_PRIVATE_KEY=
      - VPN_ENDPOINT_IP=ip
      - VPN_ENDPOINT_PORT=port
      - WIREGUARD_ADDRESSES="10.2.0.2/32"

  wireguard:
    image: linuxserver/wireguard:latest
    container_name: wireguard
    cap_add:
      - NET_ADMIN
    environment:
      - PUID=1000
      - PGID=1000
    volumes:
      - ./wireguard/config:/config
#    ports:
      # Port for WireGuard-UI
#      - "5010:5000"
      # Port of the WireGuard VPN server
#      - "36843:36843/udp"
    network_mode: service:gluetun_test
    sysctls:
      - net.ipv4.conf.all.src_valid_mark=1

wg0.conf

# Address updated at:     2023-07-08 18:51:31.120262753 +0000 UTC
# Private Key updated at: 2023-05-09 18:59:02.233090133 +0000 UTC
[Interface]
Address = 10.252.1.0/24
ListenPort = 36843
PrivateKey = 
MTU = 1450
PostUp = iptables -A FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -A POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
PostDown = iptables -D FORWARD -i wg0 -j ACCEPT; iptables -t nat -D POSTROUTING -o eth0 -j MASQUERADE
Table =

[Peer]
PublicKey = 
PresharedKey = 
AllowedIPs = 10.252.1.1/24
  • NewDataEngineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I suspect they are both using the same interface wg0. I did a quick Google and it looks like you can do the following in gluetun

    WIREGUARD_INTERFACE=wg1

    This is my suspicion as you’re using essentially two wireguard instances at the same time.