That was so awful

Yeah, but you really don’t need to be an ass and flaunt it everywhere.

No, just disagreeing the bullshit of a clueless internet stranger.

See above comment for reply then sprinkle a bit of irony for the projection coming from you.

No, I don’t think I am. You’re just wrong and don’t want to admit it. Some self reflection will do you good.

Except you keep claiming it’s fire. It’s not fire, so stop calling it such.

No, I’m just saying you’re wrong at this point. You just keep proving that to be true with every reply.

Your definition does not make it the definition. Nobody really cares about your definitions or what you would do with it. People care about the accepted definitions and what is the expectation.

No, it just doesn’t fit in your imagination, but it is a 2 way connection by definition. It’s also everything the ISP promises when they give you an internet connection.

You have a 2 way connection as facilitated by the CGNAT gateway that routes responses back to your network.

No it doesn’t. It means you have access to the internet through that company’s infrastructure. You still have full access to the internet behind a CGNAT even if you can’t be reached directly from the internet.

Could always see if they offer a static IP. My ISP uses CG NAT and I just pay $10/month for a public static ip to bypass it.