• 0 Posts
  • 119 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: June 15th, 2023

help-circle









  • It depends. Sometimes the authors retain the rights either through a less restrictive publisher or through self-publishing and can set terms for their works, while other authors cannot.

    In your example, Kodansha may own the right to publish the manga in their magazine but that doesn’t always mean they own the IP for that manga. So if Kodansha decides to publish an issue of their magazine that has that manga in another country, they can, but they may need permission from the mangaka depending on how the rights were sorted. However, Kodansha may not own the IP rights and could therefore not release the individual manga. This is generally all stuff stipulated through contracts, and a particularly influential mangaka may get more leeway with a less restrictive contract over someone new or without a track record.

    This gets even messier when multiple people or companies own partial rights to an IP. In those cases, usually one company just stops caring but refuse to sell their share, and the IP effectively dies forever.


  • I get that Lemmy’s (and Reddit’s) favorite Bogeyman is capitalism, but the system of economics generally has absolutely nothing to do with region locking content.

    Generally, content is region locked for reasons such as:

    • trademark is already taken in the destination country and the IP holder doesn’t want to register a new name

    • traditional Japanese companies literally do not care about any market outside of Japan even if that market offers more potential profit

    • the author doesn’t want to sell to the destination country

    • the destination country has content restrictions or censorship preventing sale of the work

    • the IP is licensed to a thirdy party but the third party refuses to make the content available in the destination country for whatever reason










  • “We’re making a commercial work, so we want the audience to see it. I don’t care if they say, ‘I don’t get it,’ but I don’t want them to feel unnecessarily uncomfortable. On the other hand, if we make the work completely sterile, people’s immunity will be weakened, and they will all die. Therefore, there is a way of thinking that we should dare to take on the stigma and transmit harmful things to the public.”

    I mean, hard to disagree with his sentiment. Seems like classic article author not getting past the translated words and being pedantic. This was an article written because the author read a translated Japanese interview with a Japanese media outlet, NOT a direct interview themselves.

    Imagine if no entertainment or media ever showed content considered “unsafe” or “harmful.” So many masterpieces of artwork would just be deleted from existence.