

Good! I was probably doing something wrong, but in any case seems more logical to leverage the cameras internal detection.


Good! I was probably doing something wrong, but in any case seems more logical to leverage the cameras internal detection.


Feels like nextcloud…


Have you read the readme? There is literally a text config file to fill with the camera info (url of image).
Feel free to open a ticket on codeberg or DM/PM me for any additional detail.
Indeed documentation could be better…


In my experience frigate is quite CPU intensive. I have 10 cameras and my old I7-8700 would die trying to have frigate process them all.
I opted for a different approach with LazyNVR (https://codeberg.org/LazyNVR/lazynvr-sources) leveraging the capability of the camera to perform motion detection and video recording directly. This offloaded my CPU and now I can record all 10 cameras on a OPi3.


There are rules and whoever post, must add the ai tags. But more than that, I find low effort posts like this one do not contribute to the community and are frankly human slop.
At least take the time to write a few lines on what this is and why we should bother click the link.
That will go long way toward a useful post.


You missed my point?
why can’t you just use a wireguard connection between your device and the server, or network?


I don’t get the need for those tunnels.
Wouldn’t a simple wireguard setup be enough un less you are behind CG-NAT?
Wireguard it’s there, free, open source, doesn’t rely on any external server or company…
What does these “tunnels” actually add?


Opened a ticket on your forgejo… Cannot pull the image… I don’t / can’t build it at the moment , so looking to try the pre built image


This will never be exposed to net… I understand the risks, but at least fits a need I have, and nothing else come close.
Don’t worry, it’s ok.


That’s cool… Next week I will try it for sure …
Yeah ai slop? Welcome if it’s the one and only viable solution …
Hoping some maintenance will be there tough :)


As a suggestion, ditch ollama and setup llama.cpp. it will work fine with openwebui and it’s much more efficient. (Unrelated to the ram/swap issue)


Cool man… I did the same last year, best decision ever.
Pretty easy too


Or drive a car


That’s true…


I still like it and i have seen projects with much uglier logos made by humans. Nothing against humans or AI either.


Xale, the logo is pretty, on topic and quite cute. Is it made with AI? No idea. Does it really matter?
Give open source projects a break will you?
If you don’t like the logo just say so.


The Android release, Will you publish on play store? Otherwise from next month it will be dead in the water for most people.


I have no design, but will surely make a post with a few pictures down the road, thank you for the interest!
It’s an open box approach, kind of a structure of wood around a metal motherboard plate, with place for disks and cable management, will keep taking pictures along the way and definitely make a post in a few days!


I run a few bridged, with Continuwuity.
First of all, great choice. It works perfectly and it’s very light on resources. Totally different from Synapse, specially for few users (1 user in my case) instances.
The wa bridge works just fine, but I wouldn’t rely on in for critical messages. Actually in two years I never lost a message, but … Well … My wife would NOT like that I lose even one message from her in real time.
Here my experience https://wiki.gardiol.org/5-matrix-hosting (personal wiki, no ads, no monetization)
That sucks… Maybe a good update to LazyNVR would let grab the RTSP stream…