• 9 Posts
  • 348 Comments
Joined 1 year ago
cake
Cake day: January 28th, 2025

help-circle



  • Yes, more redindancy is good and indeed worth having. Still 5 12tb drives are probably yet more energy and heat efficient than 10 4tb ones.

    Even if I had 10 4tb for free I wouldn’t use them. Maybe a couple for backup reasons or cold storage, but not active 24/7 for a domestic raid environment.

    I actually have 4 6tb hdds that I dismissed for the 4 8tb sdds, and I use two for local backup and keep two spares to replace them when they will fail.

    4 8tb in raid5 provide 24tb total space that its far more than I need, and the risk of a double failure is mitogated by a proper 3,2,1 backup strategy in place

    As for the higher I/o frankly I never felt the need. 1gbps home network is always the bottleneck anyway and if you require such disk troughput on your network, you are doing something wrong anyway.

    Even many 4k video streams would sturate your lan before saturating your disks unless you store uncompressed video streams.



  • Shimitar@downonthestreet.eutoSelfhosted@lemmy.worldCheapest 16x4tb NAS
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    10 days ago

    I wouldn’t use more than 4 or 6 disks in a home environment. Specially with mechanical drivers, power consumption 24/7 would get me very worried.

    I run 4 x 8Tb SSDs, not cheap, but solid, low power AND low heat (even more important).

    Consider also heat dissipation as most likely at home you don’t have a constant temperature and humidity, so many spinning disks can suffer from heat, and that will kill them faster

    Longevity… With so much space I would expect to keep it running a decade or more… So factor in 10x365x24 hours of operation, energy consumed, heat dissipation and failure rate.

    On top of that, whatever gpu and ram you throw at it is meaningless, whatever wi work, even an Intel n100 NUC. Having enough cables and port instead… Well.