Yeah, we pay a lot. We also got one of the lowest downtimes regarding electricity, on average approximately 10minutes per year…so that’s kind of a (small) advantage you get for the premium price

Average load 800W is 0.8kW24h30d=576kWh/M

Which is over 172€ on a 30ct/kWh contract.

Habe ich früher auch fast ausschließlich genutzt, allerdings hat mich dann irgendwann gestört, dass keine Banking a pe pes und Google bezahl nicht funktioniert haben.

Ich habe aktuell ein Bildpunkt 7 Profi. Ich würde auch gerne zum fair Telefon wechseln, bin aber noch nicht so weit, weil mir die Qualität der Kamera noch fehlt…

Wzf, wer heiratet an einem Dienstag?!

Also bei Ahornsirup hört der Spaß auf, jetzt müssen wir dann doch mal was gegen die Klimakatastrophe tun

Aber die Grünen sind doch die Verbotspartei?!

Just my 2 cents:

1. Proxmox. Flexibility for both new services via VM/LXC and backups (just install proxmox backup server alongside and you get incremental backups with nice retention settings, file-restore capabilities as well as backup consistency checks)

2. If it’s in a VM/container you don’t need to worry about backups, see 1.

3. In this case isn’t it sufficient to be able to access the data via Windows network?

Ich⭕iel

Tassen

Unsere steht direkt drüber (Außeneinheit auf dem Dach.). Kenne das Problem. Seitdem das Außengerät entkoppelt ist, ist wieder Ruhe

Tüdeldü, ich sorge mal für Aktivität

Yes,

It does not work. Additionally, the ubiquity switch does not sync with 10gbit/s to one of the qnap switches (I tested with different cables and ports, but the led on the qnap stays orange, indicating connection speed lower than 10gbit/s)

As I’m maybe returning the switch due to the problems I hesitate to register it to access settings. Jumbo frames settings could actually be the solution. But with the problem mentioned in the first paragraph I’m not sure. A 300€ device should just work IMHO…

Thanks for the suggestion with ping, I will test it.

Thanks for your input. All criteria you mentioned are met.

If I build the same connection with the second qnap switch instead of the ubiquity it is working flawlessly.

As I am not sure if I should keep it return it I hesitated to do anything else than using it as a dumb switch.

It’s just two switches.

Server 1 — 10Gbe — ubiquity switch — 10Gbe — qnap switch — 10Gbe — server 2.

Wenn’s nicht so traurig wäre :(

Yeah, der war gut

Jitsi Meet it’s usually p2p for calls between two persons. As soon as a third person joins, the meeting gets routed through the server. You can see this by a slight delay happening when person 3 joins. It won’t happen again for every additional person joining

Very interesting, thanks for sharing!

I know it’s just anecdotal evidence, however fail2ban in my one machine which does need ssh on port 22 to the open internet bans a lot of IPs every hour. All other ones with ssh on a higher port do not. Also their auth log does not show any failed attempts.