Consider the following setup:

An NFS server exports the directory /srv/nfsv4 to one client. It is exported with the option “fsid=0” for use with NFSv4.

/srv/nfsv4              192.168.0.10/24(ro,sync,secure,root_squash,subtree_check,fsid=0)

The bind-mounted directory within it, foo, is exported as well. Client 192.168.0.10 can successfully mount and write to it.

/srv/nfsv4/foo          192.168.0.10/24(rw,sync,secure,root_squash,subtree_check)

“foo” has multiple subdirectories. While client 192.168.0.10 should have full read-write access to all of them, another client, 192.168.0.20, should only see a specific subset of these directories. Everything else should not only be read-only, but not mountable at all.

At first, I did it like this:

/srv/nfsv4              192.168.0.10/24(ro,sync,secure,root_squash,subtree_check,fsid=0) \
                        192.168.0.20/24(ro,sync,secure,root_squash,subtree_check,fsid=0)

/srv/nfsv4/foo          192.168.0.10/24(rw,sync,secure,root_squash,subtree_check) \
                        192.168.0.20/24(ro,sync,secure,root_squash,subtree_check)

/srv/nfsv4/foo/dir1     192.168.0.20/24(rw,sync,secure,root_squash,subtree_check)

/srv/nfsv4/foo/dir2     192.168.0.20/24(rw,sync,secure,root_squash,subtree_check)

With the effect that client 192.168.0.20 could still mount all other subdirectories of foo (even though read-only).

So, in an attempt to achieve the desired behavior, I created a second parent directory /srv/nfsv4/bar/ that has only the intended set of subdirectories bind-mounted to it:

srv/
└── nfsv4/
    ├── foo/
    │   ├── dir1
    │   ├── dir2
    │   ├── dir3
    │   └── dir4
    └── bar/
        ├── dir1
        └── dir2

And changed /etc/exports to look like this:

/srv/nfsv4              192.168.0.10/24(ro,sync,secure,root_squash,subtree_check,fsid=0) \
                        192.168.0.20/24(ro,sync,secure,root_squash,subtree_check,fsid=0)

/srv/nfsv4/foo          192.168.0.10/24(rw,sync,secure,root_squash,subtree_check)

/srv/nfsv4/bar          192.168.0.20/24(rw,sync,secure,root_squash,subtree_check)

Now, when I mount nfs-server:/bar on client 192.168.0.20, everything seems as expected. Except that I could still mount nfs-server:/ (the exported root) and have read access to foo. My understanding was that, unless I explicitly exported foo to 192.168.0.20, it should not be visible to it.

What did I do wrong?

    • curbstickle@anarchist.nexusM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      16 hours ago

      Edit: Completely misread things, I thought you had 192.168.10.0 and 192.168.20.0. Yes it would be the whole subnet for a /24, if you wanted less you’d go higher as mentioned.

      192.168.0.0/29 would include 192.168.0.1-192.168.0.7.

      /28 would get you up to 192.168.0.15.


      No, /24 is just 256 IPs.

      192.168.0.0/24 = 192.168.0.0 mask 255.255.255.0, or 192.168.0.1-192.168.0.254.

      If you want 192.168.0.0 through, say, 192.168.7.254, you need to cover 2k ip’s, which is a /21. The mask would be 255.255.248.0.

      A /24 would only be the last octet.

    • GooeyGlob@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      15 hours ago

      No, if you mean 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.255.255, that is a /16 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.255 is a /24 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.7 is a /29

      I was a little glib in my initial response. You really don’t want to start your definition in the middle of a subnet.

      I would set it up so your first group of /29 would be 192.168.0.0 - 192.168.0.7

      Second would be 192.168.0.8 - 192.168.0.15 (192.168.0.8/29)

      Third would be 192.168.0.16 - 192.168.0.23 (192.168.0.16/29)

      And so on.