I have a GLInet travel router that is a peer connected to my Netbird network, I’d like to have any client that connects to my router to have access to the peers the travel router has access to, but still be able to access the regular internet that is being passed through by my router. Is this possible?

Ultimately I’m trying to get the TV at my girlfriend’s place to be able to access my Jellyfin instance over Netbird. According to the Netbird documentation, exit nodes and routes are depricated and should not be used, but I’m struggling hard with getting it to work with Networks.

  • I’ve created a group with my GLInet router, my Jellyfin instance, and my home server (Which hosts Jellyfin) all in the group called “Travel”.
  • I’ve created a Network called “Home” in Netbird
  • Within the “Home” network I’ve created a resource called “Jellyfin” with the IP address set to it’s Netbird IP address, and an access control group where all members of the “Travel” group have access to all ports of the “Jellyfin” resource.
  • I’ve created two routing peers within the network, one is the GLInet router and the other is my home server. Both of these are Netbird peers with Netbird installed on them.

I am very confused overall, and could use a hand if anyone wanted to walk me through what I’m doing wrong.

    • Leon@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      10 hours ago

      Yeah. It had upwards of 40 comments in the < 24h it was running. It wasn’t up-front about it though. Initially I thought it was just some person feeding questions into an LLM and pasting the responses. I guess it’s not very different from that, though.

      I think it’s what spawned this post.

      • tapdattl@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Ugh I hate that, I post questions to communities specifically to have community and engagement and conversation. If I wanted to talk to a computer (which I don’t) I’d ask a computer.

        • Leon@pawb.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          10 hours ago

          Right? If someone wants to use an LLM to troubleshoot they’d do that. Making a (unmarked) bot account to essentially fulfil that function is a bit redundant.