I really hope they double down on the Loli Yuri instead of just providing Yuri undertones again

Tubesync

Depends on the genre

• Dusk Maiden of Amnesia
• Gunslinger Girls
• Steins;Gate
• Vivy
• Ergo Proxy

🤮

British Miku only having one tooth checks out

Sadly, the community died a long time ago. Nowadays there are just isolated camps throwing shit at each other and normie tourists

Nur noch 75%, dran bleiben!

I’d hope so

Abschaffung der DSGVO und IFG

Söder hängt doch der AfD (bzw der Zwillingspartei freie Wähler) bis zum Hals im Arsch

Yep, the fade into the ED is always timed perfectly.

Miki gets increasingly annoying, I also don’t know what compelled Yota to go after her…

Das selbe passiert aktuell in Deutschland

https://github.com/cat-milk/Anime-Girls-Holding-Programming-Books

Is she gay or European?

• Bakuon!!
• Haruka Receive
• Joshiraku
• Saekano
• Dagashi Kashi
• HaNaYaMaTa

Kill la Kill on new years

Next they are gonna consume heroin and meth

And I ran a speedtest on the OpenWRT router itself to compare against. There, the upload speed also varies greatly between 35-55MBit/s, but that’s just classic cable fuckery (and still more than twice as much as OPNsense achieved in the beginning)

Yeah… well spent… not that I could just have, you know, used the ISP router and spend my time on other things ^^

I would rather not introduce any more complexity into the routing than needed. I just hope my current setup allows the networking gear to automatically adjust itself for best performance (which it now does).

iperf3 between OPNsense and OpenWRT reached 900Mbit/s, so there was no bottleneck for all kinds of traffic. It only plummeted to 15Mbit/s when there were a lot of small packets to be transmitted. When I ran a speedtest on OPNsense itself, the CPU would hit 100% and I would see 50000+ Interrupts. Because OPNsense and consequently Proxmox were both connected to a 10Gbit/s Switch Port, OPNsense just flooded the OPNsense with as much traffic as possible and without buffering on the switch OPNsense was just drowning in packets. Instead of discarding all packets OpenWRT can’t handle, I think it’s a way more elegant solution to use Flow Control to throttle the transmission to what the router is capable of. I have a hard time believing that this would affect any other traffic (especially on my LAN), because the 10GbE NIC has 8 Queues which should handle different flows and TX/RX pause packets should only throttle the affected flows. Matter of fact, I just tested and I can still hit consecutive 770Mb/s transfer from my client to my NAS while running a speedtest on the OPNsense (TrueNAS is running on the same Proxmox host as OPNsense). And when disabling flow control all together, I only hit about 750Mb/s transfer speed… So I will stick with my current configuration, as it results in reliable, 0 packet loss transmissions with maximum speeds.