I wanted to share with you all my experience on coding with AI, on a self-hosted oss.

This entire post has been fully written by me without any AI.

Edit: I violated rule 4, so I cut the long text here, please read it on the linked blog post!

Also, to be clear, the post itself has no ads and no monetization whatsoever. This is not self promotion for any scope than to share my experience on a controversial topic.

  • corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    a custom software

    “Software” and other “mass” nouns don’t get an article like that.

    • a software product
    • an application
    • software (no article)

    You gotta pick a lane.

      • soyslurper2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        This guy’s being pedantic. I say “a software” all the time.

        It’s important to understand how a language works, but don’t let grammar Nazis trick you into caring about minor rules even English speakers ignore.

        • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          22 hours ago

          It won’t kill a man but it’s still incorrect syntax and a faux pas, it’s fine if you’re fine with that, but that doesn’t make it standard.

          Also it’s not really new information that international speakers speak English better than natives, just look at all the “their” “they’re” confusion that happens when someone learned English as a native but not when they go through the whole shebang of learning about possessives and articles, so just because a native English speaker ignores a rule in their own language that doesn’t really speak much about the language, it says more about the speaker.

          • soyslurper2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            18 hours ago

            just because a native English speaker ignores a rule in their own language that doesn’t really speak much about the language, it says more about the speaker

            It doesn’t. If the speakers of a language ignore a “rule”, that says more about the rule itself. Eventually, a rule like the one we’re discussing will cease to exist since it only complicates communication, as has happened to past rules and words.

            I also have an issue with calling it “standard”. “Standard” is whatever everyone uses. Following rules that no one else does makes you sound robotic. It’s why so many guides on pronounciation in English fail. They go off of how the word is spelt and ignore how people actually say it.

            • JustARaccoon@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              16 hours ago

              nah bro, I get descriptivism is important and not locking yourself down too hard lets language evolve, but prescriptivism is how we make sure we are still able to communicate with each other clearly without confusion.

              • soyslurper2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                16 hours ago

                I agree with you. But I disagree on this rule avoiding confusion. I think it does the opposite. I think that’s why most speakers ignore it.

        • Shimitar@downonthestreet.euOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          2 days ago

          Well, rules are important and knowing them is too. Ignoring them can then be a choice, otherwise it’s just ignorance…

          But yes I fully understand your point.